#Mac nas storage review upgrade#
#Mac nas storage review Pc#
#Mac nas storage review plus#
#Mac nas storage review mac#

So it can do things that some NAS OS's can't (like say have a Photos library, or play with your Apple TV, etc). A nice feature is that you've got a second computer should it be needed, and it's a Mac. Lots of folks do this with minis, often mostly for use with media. Even slow USB on it can work if that's just used for backup. It can be a great use of an old desktop that is past it's prime look for anything with ac wifi and past 10.5 I think it is.

#Mac nas storage review mac#

Been very reliable.īTW, I forgot to mention there's a third alternative, sort of.Īnd that is to use another Mac as your NAS by setting it up as a file server.

#Mac nas storage review Pc#

I use WD Easystores a lot a fav among PC builders who shuck drives. 4 TB drives are on the dinky side these days.

#Mac nas storage review plus#

And why mess with an enclosure? You can get a very decent 10+ TB HDD for under $300 and it will last you quite a while, plus another for backup. If you don't have immediate need for NAS, and it seems you don't, then just regular old USB 3 externals should work.

not very exciting.Īnyway, I would like those who have a little bit of similar experience to share their thoughts. I am however a bit put off by the initial cost of a 4-bay NAS + 2 4TB hard drives.

My need seems to indicate that the best would be a 4 bay enclosure that I could progressively populate with 4TB disks (for a total of 12TB in RAID 5). Maybe some tweaks here and there, but that’s about it. Transfer speed is indeed somewhat important, but I do not really plan to edit photos on the NAS or DAS. At the same time, I think I may be underestimating the advantage of having access to a NAS without having to mount/eject hard drives. A DAS enclosure seems to be the way to go, but unlike a NAS where Synology and Qnap are clearly quality options, I'm very confused about the different brands for DAS (terramaster or OWC scare me a bit) on which I find much less information. I've always been able to recover my files, but that won't always be the case.Ī NAS seems the obvious way to go, but I have no real need to access that storage remotely, nor to access it with multiple devices.

#Mac nas storage review upgrade#

Having had hard drive problems in the last few months (including one again this week caused by unintentional ejections from the 5TB drive connected to my MacBook via a USB to USB-C dongle), I realize I need to upgrade to a better system if I want to avoid wasting my files and my time. So let's say I anticipate a need for about 8TB in 5 years. This will add up to a library that currently weighs about 3TB. Let's say we can assume a rate of 750GB to 1TB per year. I am also trying to implement a better discipline to eliminate unnecessary files. So I expect to do around 30k clicks this year, which means a rate of about 1.3TB of storage per year.However, I suspect that this rate will decrease a bit as I get to know the camera much better and do a lot less 'testing' than I did in the early months. After shooting with a D800 for several years, I have had my Z7 for 10 months and it has about 25k clicks. So all my RAWs are always in two places at all times (this has saved me in the last few months, but not without hassle). I also have a 6TB external hard drive that backs up the entire MacBook and the 5TB drive via time machine. Once that work is done, I transfer those files to a 5TB external hard drive. In my current setup, I have a MacBook air M1 with 1TB of storage on which I keep the recent RAWs that I have not yet selected and edited. I'm looking for a storage solution for my computer and my photo library which currently weighs about 3TB.